Foreign. There were a couple of accusations about the way that you ran the exchange and I really want to try and get to the bottom of it? Um, one of the accusations was someone that went on to bit boy sure I'm not sure if you heard the show but he mentioned that FTX was creating more tokens than there were in circulation or more tokens than they were given for their Market making role almost creating synthetic tokens and trading in these synthetic tokens that they never really had yet. he had some really convincing evidence. He showed a little bit of like on-chain data in terms of you know the number of tokens they sent to FTX versus the number of token FTX and the the tokens that were returned and his accusation was that FTX was trading synthetic or fake um to manipulate price.

Do you think that could have happened? um sorry, um so I I think that uh I I frankly don't know actually exactly what you're referring to there I am sorry, did not uh hear that particular one I'd love to look into that more if you could like send me a link to that and get back to you on that. but uh, let me just explain it to you again, let me just explain it to you like like for example, when when when a token gets listed in exchange um sometimes the token would be required to give the exchange to to launch certain tokens to The Exchange in their role as a market maker and this specific project claimed that you were selling more tokens than you had as a market maker and when time came for FDX to return the tokens to the project, there weren't enough tokens and I'm just trying to understand that. Do you think that it could be possible that maybe you guys created um, called a fake I don't synthetic tokens fake tokens I I think you're probably talking about Alameda they're not FTX and I don't know the details of that I'm I'm sorry I wasn't running Alameda and uh, but I can I can try and look into that. feels like he wants to say yes.